Optimalisasi Implementasi KMA Melalui Perencanaan Berjenjang: Antisipasi Input Heterogen dan Penyetaraan Kompetensi Bahasa Arab

Ammar Zainuddin; Ubay Harun; Endang Munawar

doi:10.61860/jigp.v4i2.301

Authors

Ammar Zainuddin Universitas KH. Abdul Chalim
Ubay Harun Datokarama State Islamic University, Palu
Endang Munawar Darul Arqam Muhammadiyah Islamic College, Garut

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61860/jigp.v4i2.301

Abstract

This paper analyzes official documents from the Ministry of Religious Affairs (KMA No. 183/2019, No. 184/2019, and No. 347/2022) and Arabic language textbooks across levels (MI grade 6, MTs grades 7 & 9, and MA grade 10) to examine the application of the Scope–Sequence–Continuity (SSC) principle in Arabic language learning and to design an Arabic language learning plan that is adaptive to input heterogeneity in Madrasahs. This research uses a qualitative method with a content analysis approach to KMA documents and official textbooks from the Ministry of Religious Affairs. The combination of regulatory sources and teaching materials allows mapping of SSC outcomes, material sequences, and repetition patterns across levels while testing the consistency between policies and classroom practices. Therefore, the analysis of each chapter is mapped in the SSC matrix and validated through source triangulation and theory triangulation to reveal the gap between the ideals of the policy and the reality of implementation. Research findings indicate that the curriculum has been designed with a relatively consistent SSC foundation, but has not fully anticipated the heterogeneity of student input. This article highlights the curriculum gap, interprets the data through content analysis, and proposes the concept of input differentiation as a novel contribution to Arabic language learning planning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almelhes, S. (2024). Enhancing Arabic language acquisition: Effective strategies for non-native learners. Education Sciences, 14(10), 1116.

Ananda, A. S., & Retnawati, H. (2023). Analisis Muatan Higher Order Thinking Skills Buku Teks Matematika SMP Kelas VIII. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 7(2), 367–367. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v7i2.8084

CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines (Version 2.2). https://udlguidelines.cast.org/

Europe, C. of. (2020). CEFR Companion Volume. https://rm.coe.int/common-european-framework-of-reference-for-languages-learning-teaching/16809ea0d4

Hidayat, L. E., Basthomi, Y., & Afrilyasanti, R. (2024). Exploring secondary school teachers’ creativity in differentiated instruction (DI) practices across Indonesian EFL classrooms. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 53, 101620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101620

Ibrahim A Asadi & Ronen Kasperski. (2024). Reading comprehension in the Arabic diglossia: The SVR model. Frontiers in Psychology. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10933202/

Kementerian Agama RI. (2019a). KMA No. 183/2019: Kurikulum PAI & Bahasa Arab pada Madrasah. https://infonanggroe.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/KMA_NOMOR_183_TAHUN_2019_PAI_DAN_BAHASA_ARAB_KAMI_MADRASAH_BLOGSPOT.pdf

Kementerian Agama RI. (2019b). KMA No. 184/2019: Pedoman Implementasi Kurikulum pada Madrasah. https://sumsel.kemenag.go.id/files/sumsel/file/file/1PENGUMUMAN17/k_KMA_NOMOR_184_TAHUN_2019_TENTANG_PEDOMAN_IMPLEMENTASI_KURIKULUM_PADA_MADRASAH-dikompresi_pdf-20190911134221.pdf

Kementerian Agama RI. (2022). Panduan Pembelajaran & Asesmen (mengacu KMA 347/2022). https://sikurma.kemenag.go.id/upload/file_info/4__kirim_PPA_Pada_Madrasah_%2826_10_2022%291.pdf

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Pergamon Press.

Language Placement Testing and the Seal of Biliteracy | Center for Languages, Literatures and Cultures. (t.t.). Diambil 1 September 2025, dari https://cllc.osu.edu/undergraduate/testing?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Mahfud & others. (2019). Evaluation of Islamic education curriculum policy in Indonesia. Journal Name. https://arxiv.org/

MTSS Center. (t.t.). Essential Components of MTSS. https://mtss4success.org/essential-components

Nassif, L., Huntley, E., & Mohamed, A. (2022). Attention to verbal morphology in L2 Arabic reading: An eye-movement study. Foreign Language Annals. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/flan.12644

North, B. (2022). The CEFR Companion Volume and the action-oriented approach. https://rm.coe.int/the-cefr-companion-volume-and-the-action-oriented-approach/1680a97137

Nurdianto, T., Hidayat, Y., & Wulandari, V. A. (2020). CEFR-based Arabic language learning competency. Izdihar: Journal of Arabic Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 3(3), 229–248.

Pladevall-Ballester, E. (2024). Focused task-based peer interaction and pre-task planning. Language Teaching Research. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/13621688241267367

Ran Wei & Xiaoyan Zhao. (2024). Effects of TBLT on functional adequacy in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S107529352400031X

Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. (2025). Consistent Implementation of a Multi-Tiered System of Supports. American Institutes for Research.

Rifa’i, I., Saefuloh, H., & Nisa, F. F. (2025). Reforming Arabic Education in Indonesian Madrasahs: A Comparative Review of KMA Decrees No. 183/2019 and No. 347/2022. ALSUNIYAT: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya Arab, 8(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.17509/alsuniyat.v8i1.82533

Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2025). Diglossic and orthographic features of reading comprehension in Standard Arabic. Reading Research Quarterly. https://ila.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/rrq.598

Septianti, A. P., Ridlo, U., & Maswani. (2024). The dynamics of Arabic curriculum transformation in Indonesia: Historical perspectives and globalization’s role. Lisanan Arabiya, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.32699/liar.v8i2.7989

Shahbari-Kassem, A. & others. (2024). The impact of lexico-phonological and diglossic distance on Arabic story reading. Frontiers in Education. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1394024/full

Sweller, J. (2023). The development of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 35, 95.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd Edition). ASCD.

Tundreng, S., Yawan, H., & Marhamah, M. (2025). IMPLEMENTING DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION IN INDONESIAN SECONDARY SCHOOLS: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FROM LANGUAGE TEACHERS. English Review: Journal of English Education, 13(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v13i1.10741

UIC Center for the Advancement of Teaching Excellence. (2023). Backward design. https://teaching.uic.edu/cate-teaching-guides/syllabus-course-design/backward-design/

Zhang, H. (2024). Formative assessment in K-12 EFL: A systematic review. Heliyon. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024073985