Strategies and Policies in Improving the Accreditation Status of Study Programs at IAIN Palangka Raya

Authors

  • Ibnu Hasan Karbila Planner of the IAIN Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61860/jigp.v3i2.150

Abstract

This policy paper explains that guaranteeing the quality of education in higher education is an absolute thing that must be implemented on an ongoing basis, one of the efforts is through the implementation of accreditation, which can provide benefits to many parties; starting from the government, prospective students or parents, the national and internasional job market, funding organizations, and for the universities or study programs concerned. IAIN Palangka Raya is the only State Islamic Higher Education in Central Kalimantan. However, the number of study programs accredited as Excellent or Very Good has not yet reached 25%. This paper uses a descriptive qualitative method with the research subjects being representatives of the Quality Assurance Institute (LPM), representatives of the study program, and representatives of the Dean, while the data collection techniques used are observation, interviews, and documentation. The results show that 3 (three) aspects are the main problems of the small number of study programs accredited as Superior at IAIN Palangka Raya, namely: low student standard scores, human resources, and the tri dharma outcomes of higher education. The value of these three criteria can be increased by carrying out budget planning using a bottom-up approach. An alternative policy solution that can be taken is policy making by the Chancellor as the Budget User Authority (KPA), by programming three activities, including implementation of overseas outreach, training in Scopus journal publication techniques, as well as expansion of overseas cooperation and follow-up, especially in the field of research and devotion.

References

Almana, L. O., Sudarmanto, & Wekke, I. S. (2018). Tata Kelola Perguruan Tinggi Berbasis Akreditasi. Deepublish.

Anwar, S., & Setiawan, D. (2020). Suksesi Akreditasi Sebagai Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi. Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial Teknik, 2(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.46799/jequi.v2i2.5

BAN-PT. (2017). Peraturan Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi Nomor 2 tahun 2017 Tentang Sistem Akreditasi Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi. In Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi. https://www.banpt.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Peraturan-BAN-PT-No.-2-Tahun-2017-ttg-SAN-Dikti_FINAL.pdf

BAN-PT. (2019). Peraturan BAN-PT No. 3 Tahun 2019.

Basuki, M., Sofiyannurriyanti, Prasanti, N., Akmal, A. K., Kasmawati, Marlinda, Hartati, R., Hidjrawan, Y., & Irmayani. (2023). Kontribusi Mahasiswa Dalam Akreditasi Program Studi Student Contribution In Study Program Acreditation. Nusantara: Jurnal Pengabdian KEpada Masyarakat, 3(2), 48–54. http://prin.or.id/index.php/nusantara

Kamal, B., & Rahmadiane, G. D. (2017). Pengaruh Persepsi , Akreditasi Prodi , Dan Promosi Terhadap Keputusan Memilih Program Studi Akuntansi Pada Politeknik Harapan Bersama. Jurnal Inspirasi Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 1(9), 145–158. http://jurnal.unswagati.ac.id/index.php/jibm

Meidelfi, D., Azmi, M., Hadi, R., & Fitri, W. R. (2018). Perancangan Aplikasi Alumni untuk Mendukung Akreditasi (Studi Kasus: Jurusan TI PNP). PROSIDING SISFOTEK (Sistem Informasi Dan Teknologi), 9(September), 255–263.

Milles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta, Universitas Indonesia.

Nasution, L., Ichsan, R. N., Hartin, V. F., & Rizkina, S. (2024). Pendampingan Akreditasi Institusi Perguruan Tinggi di Akademi Keperawatan Hkbp Balige. Jurnal Pedamas, 2(November 2023), 242–246.

PP no. 19 tahun, 2005. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah tentang standar nasional pendidikan dengan (PP no. 19 tahun 2005). Sekretariat Negara Indonesia, 1, 1–95. https://peraturan.go.id/files/pp19-2005.pdf

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2021). Standar Nasional Pendidikan. 102501.

Primadewi, A., & Hanafi, M. (2021). Pengelolaan Data Terintegrasi Berdasarkan Instrumen Akreditasi. Jurnal Resti (Rekayasa Istem Dan Teknologi Informasi), 4(6), 1124–1134.

Sanusi, A., Asbari, M., & Ardiansah, A. (2023). ASN dalam Pendidikan Tinggi: Transformasi dan Akreditasi. Journal of Information Systems and Management, 05, 58–60. https://jisma.org/index.php/jisma/article/view/636%0Ahttps://jisma.org/index.php/jisma/article/download/636/117

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung. Alfabeta.

Susilo, S., Kurniawan Budhi, R., & Prayitno, A. (2023). Aplikasi Simulasi Penilaian Instrumen Akreditasi Terstandar LAMEMBA Berbasis Web. Journal of Information Technology Ampera, 4(1), 31–45. https://journal-computing.org/index.php/journal-ita/article/view/342

UU RI No. 12/2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi. (2012). Undang Undang, 18.

Wahyudi, W. (2020). Kinerja Dosen: Kontribusinya Terhadap Akreditasi Perguruan Tinggi. SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF REFLECTION : Economic, Accounting, Management and Business, 3(4), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.37481/sjr.v3i4.241

Wibowo, U. B. (2019). Akreditasi dan peluang penguatan kelembagaan program studi pendidikan dasar pada perguruan tinggi. JMIE: Journal of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Education, 3(2), 130–141. http://e-journal.adpgmiindonesia.com/index.php/jmie

Downloads

Published

01/10/2025

How to Cite

Karbila, I. H. (2025). Strategies and Policies in Improving the Accreditation Status of Study Programs at IAIN Palangka Raya. JURNAL ILMIAH GEMA PERENCANA, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.61860/jigp.v3i2.150