Budget Optimization Policy Through Budget Revision in an Effort to Increase Performance Achievements at UIN Alauddin Makassar

Authors

  • A. Gustang Planner of UIN Alauddin Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61860/jigp.v3i1.101

Abstract

This policy paper discusses budget optimization policies through effective and efficient budget revisions to improve the performance achievements of planners at UIN Alauddin Makassar. The budget revision policy is an important tool to ensure the budget is used efficiently, effectively, and accountably. At UIN Alauddin Makassar, there are several obstacles in implementing the budget revision policy, such as low budget absorption, decreased performance achievements, lack of clarity in the budget revision mechanism, slow budget revision process, and lack of stakeholder involvement. This study uses qualitative methods with descriptive data analysis techniques. Data was obtained from document studies and field observations. The study results show inefficiencies in the budget allocation process, budget absorption is still low, and the work culture does not support efficient and effective use of the budget. This study resulted in recommendations that UIN Alauddin Makassar needs to take several steps, such as: preparing clear and comprehensive budget revision guidelines, building a monitoring and evaluation system for the budget revision process, increasing HR capacity in handling the budget revision process, increasing stakeholder involvement in the budget revision process, analyzing the impact of budget revisions on performance achievements before carrying out revisions, increasing synergy between budget revision policies and other policies, and utilizing information technology. By implementing these steps, it is hoped that UIN Alauddin Makassar can increase the optimization of budget absorption, increase the efficiency and effectiveness of budget use, increase performance achievements, increase stakeholder satisfaction, and increase public trust.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, Syukriy, Muhtar Muhtar, Marwan Marwan, dan Aliamin Aliamin. 2019a. “Serapan Anggaran pada Organisasi Perangkat Daerah: Bukti Empiris dari Kota Banda Aceh”. Jurnal Akuntansi Publik 2 (1): 66–83. https://doi.org/10.32554/jap.v2.i1.p66-83.

———. 2019b. “Serapan Anggaran pada Organisasi Perangkat Daerah: Bukti Empiris dari Kota Banda Aceh.” Jurnal Akuntansi Publik 2 (1): 66–83. https://doi.org/10.32554/jap.v2.i1.p66-83.

Amstrong, Michael, and Angelo Baron. 1998. Performance Management. London: Institute of Personal and Development.

Feriyanto, Andri, dan Triana Endang Shyta. 2015. “Pengantar Manajemen,” no. February.

Fitriandini, Dinda, dan Tituk Diah Widajantie. 2021. “The Effect of Participation in Budgeting, Utilization of Information Technology, and Budget Revision on the Effectiveness of Surabaya Government OPD Budget Management”. Accounting and Finance Studies 1 (2): 125–37. https://doi.org/10.47153/afs12.1252021.

Indra Bastian. 2016. Strategi Manajemen Sektor Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Irham Fahmi. 2018. Analisis Kinerja Keuangan: Panduan Bagi Akademisi, Manajer dan Investor untuk Menilai dan Menganalisis Bisnis dari Aspek Keuangan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Kementerian Keuangan. 2021. “PMK Revisi.” https://djpb.kemenkeu.go.id/ kppn/pematangsiantar/id/data-publikasi/pengumuman/2900-pmk-nomor-199-tahun-2021-tentang-tata-cara-revisi-anggaran.html.

Lebas, Michel, and Ken Euske. 2002. “A Conceptual and Operational Delineation of Performance”. Dalam, Business Performance Measurement, 65–79. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753695.006.

Nengsih, Yeni Rafika, Andria Ningsih, Jennisa Dwina Indriani, dan Kuliman. 2021. “… Anggaran, Revisi Anggaran dan Kompetensi Sumber Daya Manusia Terhadap Penyerapan Anggaran OPD Pemerintah Kabupaten Lima ….” … PROFITA: Akuntansi dan Manajemen 2 (November): 143–49. https://doi.org/10.47896/ab.v2i2.486.

Rahimudin, Hindra Eka. 2007. “Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran, Ketidakpastian Lingkungan dan Revisi Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Manajer.”

Strajhar, P., Y. Schmid, E. Liakoni, P. C. Dolder, K. M. Rentsch, D. V. Kratschmar, A. Odermatt, et al. 2016. “Nature Methods 7 (6): 2016.

Taufiqurokhman. 2008. “Konsep dan Kajian Ilmu Perencanaan.” Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Prof. Dr. Moestopo Beragama, 1–106.

Wardhana, Aditya, dan Anggri Puspita Sari. 2023. “Manajemen Kinerja (Konsep, Teori, dan Penerapannya) Ade Onny Siagian Bina Sarana Informatika.” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368363694.

Wiwit, Sriwulandari. 2015. “Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Revisi Anggaran pada Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia (Studi pada Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Tahun 2013-2015).” Донну 5 (December): 118–38.

Yulianti, Nur Wachidah. 2019. “Serapan Anggaran UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta: Sebelum dan Sesudah Revisi Anggaran.” Akuntabilitas 12 (1): 37–52. https://doi.org/10.15408/akt.v12i1.10957.

Downloads

Published

08/12/2024

How to Cite

Gustang, A. (2024). Budget Optimization Policy Through Budget Revision in an Effort to Increase Performance Achievements at UIN Alauddin Makassar. JURNAL ILMIAH GEMA PERENCANA, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.61860/jigp.v3i1.101