Legal Pluralism and Social Control: An Empirical Study of Adultery Law Reform

Muhamad Aminulloh; Nayla Zhafirah; Radif Khotamir Rusli

doi:10.61860/jigp.v4i2.397

Authors

Muhamad Aminulloh Universitas Djuanda Bogor, Jawa Barat
Nayla Zhafirah Universitas Djuanda Bogor, Jawa Barat
Radif Khotamir Rusli Universitas Djuanda Bogor, Jawa Barat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61860/jigp.v4i2.397

Keywords:

Criminal Code; Empirical studies; Gender; Legal reform; Social impact.

Abstract

Significant changes have been made to several criminal provisions with the ratification of the 2023 Criminal Code (KUHP), including an expanded definition of the crime of adultery. These modifications have generated diverse social reactions, particularly regarding potential violations of fundamental human rights and gender inequality in their implementation. This study aims to empirically investigate the impact of these new provisions on society in several regions of Indonesia. A qualitative methodology was used, focusing on appropriate feminist and human rights perspectives. Data collection techniques included documentation, observation, and public perception. Based on the research findings, the 2023 Criminal Code provisions on adultery have the potential to be used as a tool of social control, particularly against women, and to criminalize private behavior. This is interesting because the impact of their implementation in the field demonstrates inequality in legal treatment and a lack of understanding of the principles of human rights and gender justice. Theoretically, this study contributes to the fields of criminal law and sociological law while also assisting in the evaluation of public policy and the defense of fundamental human rights. Therefore, it is recommended that these provisions be evaluated to ensure they align with constitutional values, respect privacy, and protect vulnerable groups.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amnesty International UK. (2022, December). Indonesia: New law is a ‘significant blow’ to human rights. https://www.amnesty.org.uk/latest/indonesia-new-law-significant-blow-human-rights/

Andini, O. G. (2024). Dissecting the Position of Living Law in the Criminal Code 2023. Rechtidee, 19(2), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v19i2.27640

BPHN. (2025). Perluas Akses Keadilan, Kemenkumham Tingkatkan Anggaran Program Bantuan Hukum Tahun 2025. https://bphn.go.id/berita-utama/perluas-akses-keadilan-kemenkumham-tingkatkan-anggaran-program-bantuan-hukum-tahun-2025

Butt, S. (2023). Indonesia’s new Criminal Code: Indigenising and democratising Indonesian criminal law? Griffith Law Review, 32(2), 190–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2023.2243772

Faisal, Yanto, A., Rahayu, D. P., Haryadi, D., Darmawan, A., & Manik, J. D. N. (2024). Genuine paradigm of criminal justice: Rethinking penal reform within Indonesia New Criminal Code. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2301634. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2301634

Halimatusa’diyah, I., & Triana, W. (2024). Sexism and women’s access to justice: Feminist judging in Indonesian Islamic judiciary. Women’s Studies International Forum, 103, 102883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102883

Hamzani, A. I., Sami’an, S., & Khasanah, N. (2026). Restorative Justice and Legal Pluralism in Indonesia: Implications for Atrocity Crimes and Global Criminal Justice Reform. International Criminal Law Review, 26(2), 217–249. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10257

Huberman, A., & Miles, M. (2002). The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986274

Indonesia, B. P. S. (BPS). (2025). Statistik Kriminal 2024/2025. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2025/12/12/2edc8ea4c35b19ba912fc7e4/statistik-kriminal-2024-2025.html

Iskandar, M., Mh, N., J.Prang, A., & Qodir, I. (2024). Extrajudicial trend in sharia law enforcement: Customary justice or vigilantism? PETITA: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v9i2.422

Isnawan, F. (2025). Zina in Consensual Non-Monogamous Relationships: A Comparative Legal Analysis between Indonesian and Islamic Law. Fikri: Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial Dan Budaya, 10(1), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.25217/jf.v10i1.6099

Jeffries, S., & Jefferson, A. M. (2022). Introduction to Gender, Criminalization, Imprisonment and Human Rights in Southeast Asia. In A. M. Jefferson & S. Jeffries (Eds), Gender, Criminalization, Imprisonment and Human Rights in Southeast Asia (pp. 1–11). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80117-286-820221001

Komnas Perempuan. (2025, June 2). CATAHU 2024: Menata data, menajamkan arah: Refleksi pendokumentasian dan tren kasus kekerasan terhadap perempuan. https://komnasperempuan.go.id/catatan-tahunan-detail/catahu-2024-menata-data-menajamkan-arah-refleksi-pendokumentasian-dan-tren-kasus-kekerasan-terhadap-perempuan

LBH APIK. (2024). Laporan Tahunan 2024 LBH APIK Jakarta—Pengabaian Negara: Inkonsistensi Penegakan Hukum dan Pelindungan Perempuan yang Adil Gender. https://www.lbhapik.org/laporan-detail/98

LSI. (2025, April 14). Rilis Survei terkait Isu Revisi KUHAP. https://www.lsi.or.id/post/rilis-survei-terkait-isu-revisi-kuhap

Martitah, M., Sulistianingsih, D., Mohd Yusoff, R., & Ismail, N. (2024). Insufficient criminal justice system response to the severity of domestic violence during the pandemic in Indonesia. Heliyon, 10(14), e33719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33719

Mozin, N., Jamin, M., & Hartiwiningsih, H. (2025). Gender Inequality in the Law Enforcement of Adultery: A Critical Analysis of the Treatment of Women. In K. Tejomurti & S. Solikhah (Eds), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Law, Economics & Good Governance (IC-LAW 2025) (Vol. 985, pp. 606–614). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-519-5_48

Mubayyinah, F., Handayani, F., & Sifa’, Moh. A. (2025). Legal Pluralism, Epistemic Tensions, and the Reformulation of the Adultery Offense in Indonesia’s New Penal Code. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 573–594. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v8i2.14957

Natalis, A. (2026). Condom use in Indonesia: Interplay with societal norms and human rights. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 8, 100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2026.100225

Perbaya, A., & Juhana, U. (2025). Vigilante Law Enforcement Eigenrichting Causing Death Through a Criminological Perspective. Journal La Sociale, 6(6), 1863–1870. https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v6i6.2453

Putri, N. S. (2025). Moral Offenses Under Indonesian Criminal Code 2023 in Perspective of Religious Minority. Jurnal HAM, 16(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2025.16.61-76

Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hukum Jinayat, No 6/2014 41 pages (2014). https://dsi.acehprov.go.id/media/2023.07/qanun_aceh_nomor_6_tahun_2014_tentang_hukum_jinayat1.pdf

Sembiring, R. E. B., Tambunan, E. M., Hutabarat, H. F., & Afandi, M. (2024). Analisis tindak pidana perzinaan dalam pembaharuan hukum pidana dan qanun jinayat di Aceh. Iblam Law Review, 4(2), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i2.408

Srirejeki, K., & Khairurrizqo, K. (2025). The role of community engagement as corruption control strategy in local governments: Insights from Indonesia. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 38(7), 872–894. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-12-2024-0407

Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Pub. L. No. 1, No 1/2023 229 pages. (2023). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/details/234935/uu-no-1-tahun-2023

UNDP. (2023). Indonesia Rule of Law and Human Rights Global Programme. https://rolhr.undp.org/annualreport/2023/asia-pacific/indonesia.html

Wahyumah, I., & Saputra, T. (2024). Comparative Analysis of the Crime of Overspel (Adultery) in the Articles of the New Criminal Code and the Old Criminal Code Related to Adultery. Journal of Social Science, 5(4), 1034–1048. https://doi.org/10.46799/jss.v5i4.900

Widyawati, A., Fernando, Z. J., Arifin, R., & Mursyid, A. M. (2026). Legal Challenges in Criminal Execution of The Environmental Crime Cases in Indonesia: Efforts Toward Criminal Law Reform. Jambe Law Journal, 9(1), 53–88. https://doi.org/10.22437/k1djt237