Distributive Justice and Ethical Challenges in Digitizing Pesantren Land Certificates

Authors

  • Biyati Ahwarumi Department of Islamic Economy /Universitas Sunan Drajat
  • Anas Alhifni Department of Islamic Economy/Universitas Djuanda
  • Martin Roestamy Postgraduate School of Law/Universitas Djuanda
  • Radif Khotamir Rusli Islamic Studies Program/Universitas Djuanda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61860/jigp.v4i2.329

Keywords:

Digital Ethics; Distributive Justice; Islamic Education; Land Certificate Digitization; Procedural Equity.

Abstract

Indonesia's national land certificate digitization, while promising administrative efficiency, creates a compelling paradox within its unique socio-religious landscape, particularly for pesantren, where formal ownership intersects with religious endowments (waqf) and communal systems. This study investigates the critical gap between this technocratic initiative and the principles of distributive justice, asking how digitization impacts pesantren amidst complex tenure realities. Employing a qualitative philosophical-empirical approach, it integrates theoretical analysis of Rawlsian, capabilities, and recognitional justice with a systematic review of legal documents, digital literacy data, and pesantren distribution. The findings reveal that the standardized digital framework generates procedural injustices because it ignores profound rural digital literacy divides and violates recognitional justice by failing to accommodate traditional waqf arrangements. Consequently, it disproportionately advantages larger urban institutions, marginalizing smaller rural pesantren and undermining equitable distribution. While limited to a theoretical-empirical synthesis, this research offers novelty by proposing an integrated ethical framework to reconcile technology with fairness, advocating for human-centric design, digital literacy investment, adapted land categories, and restorative mechanisms, thus ensuring digitization advances, rather than impedes, justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ackerly, B., Cabrera, L., Forman, F., Johnson, G. F., Tenove, C., & Wiener, A. (2024). Unearthing grounded normative theory: Practices and commitments of empirical research in political theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 27(2), 156–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2021.1894020.

Ahmed, S., Sumi, A. A., & Aziz, N. A. (2024). Exploring Multi-Religious Perspective of Artificial Intelligence. Theology and Science, 23(1), 104–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2024.2436783.

Al-Tulaibawi, A., de Frutos Madrazo, P., & Martín-Cervantes, P. A. (2024). Waqf: An Advanced Approach to Combating Agricultural Land Fragmentation in Islamic Countries. World, 5(4), 1386-1403. https://doi.org/10.3390/world5040070.

AlBataineh, A. F. (2025). The effect of smart contracts (blockchain technology) on Jordan’s land registry and survey department for sustainable development. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00797-7.

Almomani, M. A.-A., AbuAlhoul, M. A., Alqudah, M. T., & Al-Khalidi, I. K. (2024). Exploring Digital Waqf Management: Opportunities and Challenges. International Journal of Religion, 5(12), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.61707/ax7vd794.

Alsaghir, M. (2025). Digital risks and Islamic FinTech: a road map to social justice and financial inclusion. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 16(7), 1265-1282. https://doi.org/10.1108/jiabr-10-2022-0262.

Ameyaw, P. D., & de Vries, W. T. (2021). Toward smart land management: Land acquisition and the associated challenges in Ghana. A look into a blockchain digital land registry for prospects. Land, 10(3), 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10030239.

Anagnostopoulos, G., & Santas, G. (2024). Aristotle and Rawls on Economic (In)equalities and Ideal Justice. Principles and Praxis in Ancient Greek Philosophy, 321–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51146-2_16.

Argento, D., Dobija, D., Grossi, G., Marrone, M., & Mora, L. (2025). The unaccounted effects of digital transformation: implications for accounting, auditing and accountability research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 38(3), 765-796. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-01-2025-7670.

Bennett, R. M., Hutabarat, I. R., Unger, E.-M., Ginting, C. P., van der Vegt, H., & Latif, A. (2023). Digital Transformation in Indonesian Land Administration. Geospatial Science for Smart Land Management, 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003349518-7.

Bianchi, P., De Propris, L., & Labory, S. (2024). People-centred policies for a just transition (digital, green and skills). Contemporary Social Science, 19(1-3), 262-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2024.2351479.

Dorrien, G. (2021). Nancy Fraser, Iris Marion Young, and the Intersections of Justice: Equality, Recognition, Participation, and Third Wave Feminism. American Journal of Theology & Philosophy, 42(3), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.5406/21564795.42.3.01.

Duasa, J., & Munir, M. (2025). Green Waqf and Sustainable Development. Islamic Finance and Sustainability, 508–541. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003518617-26.

Fanani, M., & Pohl, F. (2024). Fiqh-Based Social Transformation in Farmer Empowerment: A Participatory Action Research Approach. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 62(2), 305–335. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2024.622.305-335.

Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Series: New Directions in Critical Theory, 31, 224. 1-11. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7312/fras14680.

Fraser, N. (2011). Mercantilização, proteção social e emancipação: as ambivalências do feminismo na crise do capitalismo. Revista Direito GV, 7(2), 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1808-24322011000200011.

Fraser, N. (2014). Behind Marx’s Hidden Abode. New Left Review, 55–72. https://doi.org/10.64590/kdf.

Garcés-Velástegui, P. (2025). The Capability Approach. Liberal Welfarism as an Approach to Governance, 11–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-01862-5_2.

García-Sánchez, E., Correia, I., Pereira, C. R., Willis, G. B., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., & Vala, J. (2021). How Fair is Economic Inequality? Belief in a Just World and the Legitimation of Economic Disparities in 27 European Countries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(3), 382–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211002366.

Gebrihet, H. G., & Pillay, P. (2021). Emerging Challenges and Prospects of Digital Transformation and Stakeholders Integration in Urban Land Administration in Ethiopia. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, 13(3), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0.

Gherheș, V., Grecea, C., Vilceanu, C. B., Herban, S., & Coman, C. (2025). Challenges in Systematic Property Registration in Romania: An Analytical Overview. Land, 14(5), 1118. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14051118.

Hertwig, R., Herzog, S. M., & Kozyreva, A. (2023). Blinding to Circumvent Human Biases: Deliberate Ignorance in Humans, Institutions, and Machines. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 19(5), 849–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231188052.

Ho, P., & Zhao, H. (2024). The complexity of religious land use: Mosques, titling and informality in China (1949–2023). Land Use Policy, 146, 107262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107262.

Jafar, A., Ibrahim, H., & Malik, R. (2025). Waqf: from classical charitable system to modern financial tool. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoes-10-2024-0354.

Kempeneer, S., Pirannejad, A., & Wolswinkel, J. (2023). Open government data from a legal perspective: An AI-driven systematic literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 40(3), 101823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101823.

Lim, A., & Pan, E. (2021). 'Toward a Global Social Contract for Trade’-a Rawlsian approach to Blockchain Systems Design and Responsible Trade Facilitation in the New Bretton Woods era. Journal of Responsible Technology, 6, 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2021.100011.

Mesgar, M., & Ramirez-Lovering, D. (2021). Informal land rights and infrastructure retrofit: A typology of land rights in informal settlements. Land, 10(3), 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10030273.

Mhlongo, S., & Dlamini, R. (2022). Digital Inequities and Societal Context: Digital Transformation as a Conduit to Achieve Social and Epistemic Justice. Innovation Practices for Digital Transformation in the Global South, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12825-7_1.

Mohamed, A., & Akande, A. E. (2025). Waqf-led buildings and green infrastructure role in environmental sustainability: understanding critical gaps in current research landscape. Management & Sustainability: An Arab Review, https://doi.org/10.1108/msar-09-2024-0152.

Mongin, P., & Pivato, M. (2021). Rawls’s difference principle and maximin rule of allocation: a new analysis. Economic Theory, 71(4), 1499-1525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-021-01344-x.

Pang, M.-S., Kankanhalli, A., Aanestad, M., Ram, S., & Maruping, L. M. (2024). Digital Technologies and the Advancement of Social Justice: A Framework and Agenda. MIS Quarterly, 48(4), 1591–1610. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2024/484e3.

Qizam, I., Berakon, I., & Ali, H. (2024). The role of halal value chain, Sharia financial inclusion, and digital economy in socio-economic transformation: a study of Islamic boarding schools in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 16(3), 810–840. https://doi.org/10.1108/jima-03-2024-0108.

Rawls, J. (1997). The Idea of Public Reason. Deliberative Democracy, 93–142. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2324.003.0007.

Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as Fairness. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv31xf5v0.

Rusydiana, A. S., Sukmana, R., Laila, N., & Riani, R. (2025). Waqf Development Models for Sustainable Development Goals: An Analytic Network Process Approach. International Journal of Islamic Finance and Sustainable Development, 17(1), 51-74. https://doi.org/10.55188/ijifsd.v17i1.929.

Sen, A. (1993). Capability and Well‐Being. The Quality of Life, 30–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198287976.003.0003.

Sen, A. (1999). Beyond the Crisis. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814379311.

Sommer, F., & de Vries, W. T. (2023). Values and representations in land registers and their legal, technical, social effects on land rights as an administrative artefact. Land Use Policy, 135, 106946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106946.

Umam, K., Shaharuddin, A. B., Fratama, A. Z., Mahmudi, L. N., & Roslan, I. A. (2023). Darussalam Gontor Waqf Models Based on Local Wisdom in Creating Inclusive and Quality Education. Proceedings of the Conference on SDGs Transformation Through the Creative Economy: Encouraging Innovation and Sustainability (TCEEIS 2023), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-346-7_18.

Wajdi, M. B., Marpuah, S., Binti Ahmad, S. B., R., A. R., & Rusdi., M. (2025). Reconceptualization of Islamic Education in Indonesia: Future Strategies and Approaches. EDUKASI: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Agama Dan Keagamaan, 23(2), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.32729/edukasi.v23i2.1991.

Yugo, T. (2025). Improving the Quality of Islamic Education through Pesantren-Based Management in Indonesia. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 3(2), 238–254. https://doi.org/10.70376/jerp.v3i2.357.

Downloads

Published

12/23/2025

How to Cite

Ahwarumi, B., Alhifni, A., Roestamy, M., & Rusli, R. K. (2025). Distributive Justice and Ethical Challenges in Digitizing Pesantren Land Certificates. JURNAL ILMIAH GEMA PERENCANA, 4(2), 1705–1722. https://doi.org/10.61860/jigp.v4i2.329