Toward a Holistic Paradigm: Integrating Agency and Communion in Indonesia's Victim Justice System

Authors

  • Eva Nurlaelisa Christianty Borobudur University Jakarta
  • Izhar Zahri Nasution Borobudur University Jakarta
  • Robertus Hadi Susanto Borobudur University Jakarta
  • Agung Fernando Borobudur University Jakarta
  • Faisal Santiago Borobudur University Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61860/jigp.v4i3.344

Keywords:

Procedural Justice; Justice; Communion; Crime Victims; Victimology.

Abstract

This article proposes a new conceptual paradigm for understanding justice for crime victims by emphasizing two fundamental dimensions of human existence: agency and communion. The background of the problem indicates that despite normative progress, traditional justice approaches—retributive, restorative, and procedural—have yet to fully address the victim's need to simultaneously restore these two existential dimensions, creating a gap between the ideal of holistic justice and the fragmented reality of practice. This study aims to address the specific problem of formulating a justice framework that integrates the restoration of the victim's agency (sense of control and autonomy) and communion (social connectedness). The methodology employed is qualitative with a theoretical-conceptual research design, utilizing an in-depth literature review of social psychology theories, victimology, and legal philosophy. Data analysis techniques include content analysis and conceptual synthesis to construct an integrative model. The study results in a "Rehabilitative Justice" framework that integrates elements of traditional paradigms to simultaneously restore victims' agency and communion. The discussion reveals that this approach provides a theoretical foundation for reforming the Indonesian criminal justice system to be more humanistic and victim-centered. In conclusion, justice for victims must be understood as an existential rehabilitation process that restores dignity and social bonds. Recommendations include a philosophical reorientation of criminal law, a procedural reconstruction towards meaningful participation, and an institutional transformation of victim protection agencies towards comprehensive psychosocial and existential support.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kong, C., Jacobson, J., & Cooper, P. (2025). The humanising imperative for effective participation: Humean virtues and the limits of procedural justice. International Journal of Law in Context, 21(3), 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744552325000060.

Lynch, O. (2023). Victims and victimhood: the case of terrorism and political violence. A Research Agenda for Terrorism Studies, 43–61. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789909104.00008.

Zehr, H., & Mika, H. (2017). Fundamental Concepts of Restorative Justice. Restorative Justice, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351150125-4.

Gal, T., & Dancig-Rosenberg, H. (2020). Characterizing Multi-Door Criminal Justice: A Comparative Analysis of Three Criminal Justice Mechanism. SSRN Electronic Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3539976.

Pemberton, A., & Mulder, E. (2024). Victimization as transformative experience: A phenomenological perspective. Theoretical Criminology, 29(2), 214–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806241271764.

Van Dijk, F., & Jonski, K. (2025). Hungarian Judges’ Attitudes Towards the “Illiberal State.”. European Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2(2), https://doi.org/10.62355/ejels.26458.

Fennig, M., & Denov, D. M. (2022). The impact of trauma, flight and protracted displacement on the mental health of Eritrean refugees living in Israel: An exploratory study of coping strategies. SSM - Mental Health, 2, 100102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2022.100102.

Thurston, B. L., & Bakan, D. (1969). The Duality of Human Existence. Review of Religious Research, 10(2), 122. https://doi.org/10.2307/3510925.

Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 751–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751.

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005.

Janoff-Bulman, R. (2015). Rebuilding Shattered Assumptions after Traumatic Life Events. Oxford Clinical Psychology, Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780195119343.003.0014.

Rimé, B. (2009). Emotion Elicits the Social Sharing of Emotion: Theory and Empirical Review. Emotion Review, 1(1), 60–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073908097189.

Pemberton, A., Aarten, P. G., & Mulder, E. (2017). Beyond retribution, restoration and procedural justice: the Big Two of communion and agency in victims’ perspectives on justice. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(7), 682–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316.

Duff, R. A. (2000). Punishment, Communication, and Community. Oxford University Press, New York, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195104295.001.0001.

Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511804618.

Pemberton, A. (2015). Changing frames? Victims and Restorative Justice, 126–152. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203070826-7.

Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828609.

Erez, E., & Tontodonato, P. (1992). Victim participation in sentencing and satisfaction with justice. Justice Quarterly, 9(3), 393–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829200091451.

Rossner, M. (2013). Just Emotions. Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199655045.001.0001.

Franata, H. S., & Santiago, F. (2023). Juridical Analysis of the Application of Restorative Justice in Corruption Crimes in Indonesia. Journal of World Science, 2(4), 513–519. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v2i4.277.

Collins, R. (2004). Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton University Press, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851744.

Mulyana Hadi, A., Iftitah, A., & Alamsyah, S. (2023). Restorative Justice Through Strengthening Community Legal Culture in Indonesia: Challenges and Opportunity. Mulawarman Law Review, 8(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v8i1.1140.

United Nations General Assembly, U. (1985, November 29). Declaration of basic principles of justice for victims of crime and abuse of power (Resolution 40/34). Retrieved December 15, 2025, from https://www.unodc.org/pdf/rddb/CCPCJ/1985/A-RES-40-34.pdf

European Union, E.-L. (2012, October 25). Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA. Retrieved December 15, 2025, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2012/29/oj/eng

LPSK, L. P. (2022). Accessed on 15 December 2025. Laporan Tahunan 2022 [Annual Report 2022], https://www.lpsk.go.id/publikasi/clracr0oi000ncqtojcg12bq4.

Downloads

Published

01/21/2026

How to Cite

Christianty, E. N., Nasution, I. Z., Susanto, R. H., Fernando, A., & Santiago, F. (2026). Toward a Holistic Paradigm: Integrating Agency and Communion in Indonesia’s Victim Justice System. JURNAL ILMIAH GEMA PERENCANA, 4(3), 2001–2014. https://doi.org/10.61860/jigp.v4i3.344